Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD HASHAM KHAN versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 561 A Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302/120 B / 34/107 and 109, which the accused 2 has been in judicial custody since 1989 and the manner in which progress is being made. It should be considered. There was no hope of a trial in the near future in the case, so the accused was entitled to grant bail under Section 561A, CRPC under the hereditary authority of the High Court; the record did not show that the prosecution was delayed. Was using tactics and when the full challan against the accused was presented in court, it cannot be said that the trial against the accused is not in sight. The request for bail was dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Ratto Dero lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.