ISHAR FATIMA versus HAJI MUHAMMAD
Code of Conduct 1908 Section 12 (2) of the fraud case was in arbitration and the application under section 14 of the Arbitration Act was filed by the arbitrator about one week after the death of the applicant / plaintiff. And it was alleged that the game was played in connection with the court proceedings as a fake person submitted consent to the applicant's motion to approve the decree and create the court's award roll. Was made but there was no notice of application under section 14 of the Arbitration Act. The petitioner's motion was also issued which stated that under section 12 (2), to commit fraud and to make false statements in connection with the case, the CPC, though not applicable where the facts are in respect of the facts. Claiming a fraud or misrepresentation, but the provisions of Section 12 (c), the CPC must certainly apply where allegations of fraudulent misrepresentation have been made and in which they have been prosecuted. was done. It appears to the applicant properly that the fraud case was demonstrated in the case of the fraudster, the application was accepted and the decree passed in the case was set aside.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Cherat lawyer