Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AMIN versus NASIR

West Pakistan Citizens Hire Ordinance 1959 Section 13 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Appeal for Compensation challenged by the rent controller tenants in the High Court The parties agreed and the tenants were allowed to vacate the tenants on or before 6 3 1991, on 21 2 1991, filed an application under Section 12 (2), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, It was said that his deceased father had purchased premises in question from the predecessor in the interest of the landlord. 22 4 1986 and that changed in the Revenue Record, his father died on the same day that the premises were purchased and he found out about the purchase that on 2 August 1991, the father of the tenants applied for the settlement. Was launched on the 19th. 7; 1987; the tenant of the order issued the order on 29 12 1988, while the High Court disposed of the appeal on the settlement of 6 3 1989. The facts clearly indicated that the tenants in the interest record. The alleged purchase by its predecessor cannot be denied that the purchase request was made to frustrate the withdrawal order which was made on the settlement of the parties and in the case of occupying the tenants in the premises. Was given ample time and that the latter was dishonestly manipulated to exclude his ability to appeal. Come. divorce advocates from Timergara lawyer