Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 409 accused did not ask him to hand over the revolver, but he claimed that he was dismissed from the job after being arrested in the first trial against him and that he had articles in the factory. Delivery was not allowed. According to the rules in his charge and it was in his absence that the locks of the mill were broken and he could not know what had happened to the revolver in question, by the prosecution to give evidence. No evidence was presented for. The revolver was not found there after the locks were broken and the prosecutor did not even bother to investigate the investigating officer, while during interrogation the accused was questioned about handing over the revolver, which he admitted. What, but no question was asked by the defendant regarding the misuse of the revolver by this defendant, the defendant was convicted on the charge of non-confrontation, false accusation as to the specificity of the revolver in question. Because of the record against the accused, which was not recorded against him, keep the punishment and punishment against him Had gone and was acquitted of the charge under the circumstances. inheritance advocates near Chowk Munda lawyer