Find a Lawyer

MUNIR AHMAD versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 The explanation offered by one of the accused for the death of the accused was not inaccurate and the medical evidence available on the record made the accused's story more ridiculous. Was not in style. After being defended and justified by both versions, it could be said that the incident took place in a manner as prosecuted by the defense alleging that the two accomplices were falsely implicated because they did not. Neither participant nor they were present at the scene of the incident where the deceased had received a fireworks injury, five certified wounds, one wreck and one contradiction. Only one of the accused could not recover the wounds. Nor could he drag the dead outside himself. In the bath room where the victim was killed in the courtyard of the mosque, no one could blame the murderer of the special accused. Some other witnesses said the witnesses named the two accomplices as associates and did something on the record. In the absence, it can be safely found that litigation helped the two men involved in corrupt missions. That the two accomplices also participated in the undercover operation and injured the victim, as the alleged conviction of the three accused registered by the trial court was upheld, but the family was involved in the murder. Has been punished. In honor of the accused, the death sentence on the accused was not confirmed and instead they were sentenced to life imprisonment. best advocate from Kakur Town lawyer