THE STATE versus BASHIR
The appeal against the graft complaint was investigated in section 5 (2) of the Anti-Corruption Prevention Act, 1947 (XLV of 1860), section 161 Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), sections 249a & 417 but the rest The witnesses were not produced by the prosecution. The statement given to the prosecutor for several occasions for presenting the Magistrate and the Inspector Anti-Corruption Complainant stated that the Magistrate and the Inspector Police did not listen to the complaint. The complainant's evidence was not affected by trust as he was a stock witness. Did not appear before the trial. The successive dates and the court provided the final opportunity for litigation to prepare its evidence. Thus, the trial court was justified in not issuing arrest warrants against the magistrate, who was to appear on the receipt of the notice. An order of evil in which no exception can be taken under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Pannu aqil lawyer
