EMMANUAL OJAGAR versus ROZINA MALL
Lux Standi, the defendant in the third round of litigation for the recovery of his possession, filed for the defendant's last two cases for declaration of his title in relation to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3). The dismissal was decided on the part of the house in which the defendant occupied the suit, and the appeal was upheld until the leave of the High Court. What was, the claimant was allotted, he has the right to do so while the defendant has already been authorized to claim his title. All the courts of R were rejected in two sessions of litigation, so the plaintiff was not questioned that the plaintiff had a proper right to remain in possession of the house on which she resided. Can maintain an action for the acquisition of illegal property.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Kotli lawyer
