Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD USMAN ALIAS KHOJA versus STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302, 325, 324 and 323 evidence, the definition of FIR that was recorded within two hours of the incident was a genuine document and was filed at that time and it intended for eyewitnesses. Although related to the subpoena and nothing related to it, the purpose of falsely involving the accused and thus could not be construed as interest witnesses when the witnesses were injured in the presence of eyewitnesses. The accused was formerly known as the prosecution witnesses but was accused at the time of his incarceration. Face to face Deng and hatchets injuries, so the suspects' identities were no doubt evidence of the prosecution's testimony was not a material mismatch Some of the suspects did not appear in the police immediately after the incident nor did they medically examine the private in the presence of their injuries on the day of the incident and suffered injuries elsewhere. The possibility of falling and cannot be excluded on any other occasion, the accused did not give an oath statement nor Were he present there was a reasonable likelihood of his being a professional attack and in the case of freelance fighting, the culprits of the accused were still to be punished. advocate for immigration from Taxila lawyer