ALLAH DAD versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
Claim of possession by the claimant on behalf of the claimant of the mortgage clause of the Property Act 1882 Section 67 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) title was pronounced by the trial court, but in the review the Appellate Court and the High Court. Deleted. Release to appeal to the plaintiffs \ The primary reliance was on the misleading qu and the deficit scale, and when it was added to the relevant year's motion, the High Court adjourned the matter in respect of the Court of Mosaic respect. Cannot be understood Either irrelevant or non-recounting of evidence, the High Court also noted that the Khasra number was shown under the question, in the middle of the compact block in the respondents' property, the applicant did not explain any such case. Could have been enough for the Supreme Court to intervene. The two courts were denied leave to appeal the factual findings simultaneously.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Haveli Lakha lawyer