Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHANI versus MUHAMMAD SHAFI

Conviction evidence (Article 10 of 1984), Article 118 Anonymous Transaction The defendant had the burden to prove that he was responsible and he owned the property in full. There was no evidence that the plaintiff ever had any evidence. Did not originate from the claimant. That he did not provide the money nor did any certified witness be presented to the shopkeeper or to support his case, in which the plaintiff's possession was invited in the daily diary of the jurisdiction, the defendant successfully Was challenged with and the same name was restored in the name. The plaintiff failed to challenge the re-entry of the possession of the plaintiff in the name of the plaintiff, none of the factors was in favor of the plaintiff, Ounce was not discharged because the sale was anonymous, the plaintiff was the real owner and the plaintiff was There was only a mediocre owner and litigation against the parties, and the evidence they provided shows that the plaintiff's deficiency in proving anonymous transactions was lacking. The redient anonymous transaction was not proven in the circumstances registration advocate from Muridkay lawyer