UMAR HAYAT versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD
Conan e-Certificate Order 1984 Article 78 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Comparison of Signatures for the Receipt of the OXXMI, RRL and 2 Suite Loans, On the Respondent's Request, Examining the Signature of the Contract Promised The handwriting expert investigated, after comparing it with the defendant's acknowledged signatures, was of the opinion that a handwriting expert's report was received to record the statement of the handwriting expert. Afterwards, the alleged signatures on the promissory note were not of the trial court, instead the parties sought objections to the report. Was prosecuted by the trial court and was unfamiliar with the law, resulting in wastage of public time and unnecessary costs and further litigation for the parties. This was done after the court submitted the report. Handwriting expert was declared illegal by the High Court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Village Sunder lawyer