MUSHTAQ AHMAD versus MUHAMMAD IKRAM-UL-HAQ
Code of Conduct 1908 Section 115 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 12 revises the specific performance of the contract, exercising questions, whether the plaintiff agreed to sell the plaintiff's property to another plaintiff, because of a plaintiff's Mukhtar E was actually the lawyer of the defendant and whether the alleged sale agreement was a genuine document, the courts below had questions about the facts, which were capable of admitting or denying the evidence that the parties owned. Has given his conscious mind a voice even after being exposed to the evidence and the circumstances. And for good reasons, these facts were ultimately found against the plaintiff / applicant, in the absence of any unlawful interference, material irregularity or scope of defect, simultaneous decisions and court orders, The jurisdiction of the High Court cannot be interfered with, especially if the evidence is not misinterpreted. Was identified
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Vehari lawyer