MAUJ DIN versus BANO
The Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Plaintiff's Declaration of Decree and Permanent Order was dismissed by the trial court but the decision was referred to the Appellate High Court, the first Appellate Court decision in the second appeal. Was rejected and restored. After admitting all the evidence to the trial court's leave, the High Court concluded that Defendant, 1, clearly, had found the mutation of fraud and collective sale in his favor, and The same was dismissed by the Collector's High Court after the entire evidence was redefined. Concluded that the evidence presented by the law and the parties and such inquiry was not subject to any exception, refused permission to appeal, was denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Loralai lawyer