Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MAUJ DIN versus BANO


The Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Plaintiff's Declaration of Decree and Permanent Order was dismissed by the trial court but the decision was referred to the Appellate High Court, the first Appellate Court decision in the second appeal. Was rejected and restored. After admitting all the evidence to the trial court's leave, the High Court concluded that Defendant, 1, clearly, had found the mutation of fraud and collective sale in his favor, and The same was dismissed by the Collector's High Court after the entire evidence was redefined. Concluded that the evidence presented by the law and the parties and such inquiry was not subject to any exception, refused permission to appeal, was denied

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for fresh advocates from Loralai lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.