Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD BASHIR versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 409 Anti-Corruption Act (11 of 1947), Section 5 (2) was passed on the accused for the repair / construction of a primary school wall Rs 12,000, the accused was the project manager while the complainant was in charge. Was. As a member of the Project Union Council accused, in two installments transferred to the complainant, 000,000 thousand rupees but the remaining three thousand did not pass to him, the defendant's position was that he bought the cement with that amount. Which the complainant refused to take, and the exchange was later handed over to the cement secretary's office so that it could be deposited and the money was deposited into the account. No evidence was offered to support such request. No receipt was received for the purchase of cement, nor was the secretary who dealt with the cement himself charged. Making no statement under section 404040 (?), the CCPC reached a trial by the trial court to dismiss the allegation of misconduct against it. For the offender to commit the crime, no interference was sought and the sentence was retained power of attorney advocate Ugoki lawyer