GHULAM AHMED versus AZIZAN
Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), section 11 for a race jostata suit for declaration and injunction, even if it is prohibited under the principle of the claimant's request for race jurisdiction, before the plaintiff The case was filed. Defendant's claim was acknowledged in the statement, similarly to appear on the same cause of action and the principle of justice related to the same subject was barred. Such request was not made through the material on record. Was excluded, which was intended to represent the plaintiff in a previous case. Against this he stated in his evidence that he did not know the plaintiff personally (the defendant in the previous case) and when he made a written statement in favor of him and made a thumb impression on the power of attorney. Had never raised his veil. The thumb impression states that the thumb impressions on the disputed documents were not of the plaintiff in the previous case, nor was the first case filed by the female defendant, neither filed with the plaintiff's consent nor In its own right, the present plaintiff had made a written statement acknowledging the claim of the plaintiff, which did not affect the principles of the judiciary.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Manoabad lawyer