GHULAM NABI PIRZADA versus CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR, AUQAF
Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1947, XLV (1) of section 186, section 161/34 Investigating the evidence, the complainant not only exaggerated the story but independently of the truth But the accused received the tainted money while the complainant was not present when the tainted money had reached the co-accused, only the complainant's words alone linked the two accused. But it was not confirmed by any other evidence and the suspect was taken advantage of on the basis of the allegations.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Sakardu lawyer
