Find a Lawyer

RAMZAN BIBI versus AHMAD DIN

The Civil Procedure Code Order XVII and XVII of the CPC Adjustments, R3 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) also upheld the plaintiff's case for possession of evidence and for the dismissal of the order, in which the High Court Also dismissed the case. The appeal was granted for leave to review: (i) whether to apply the provisions of OXVII, R3, CPC in the trial court, or to adjourn the trial or to pass any order other than sentence. Is arbitrary. (ii) if the court has the desired discretion. Regardless, it is used properly, especially if the interest of young children is regularly protected. (iii) in view of the plaintiff's clear ground in relation to the record of the rights of the plaintiff, and, the defendant did not deny the record of such rights and the effect thereof, and thus he If its adverse possession is relied upon, this case may be excluded under O XVII, R 3, CPC. (iv) Or, it should have been decided on the basis that the defendants' original property, in spite of a serious fight, failed to establish an application for illegal possession in the facts and circumstances of the present case. And (v) other related questions law firms from Rawat lawyer