Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ versus NASEEM AKHTAR


CPC Summer Rule XXXVII, RRL & 2Suit of CPC Summary Procedure for Debt Receipt, Plaintiff / Plaintiffs' alleged checks claiming to have failed to prove that the plaintiff's bank The defendant could not credibly prove that the defendant had placed the disputed amount on the plaintiff to prove through credible evidence that he had actually provided the plaintiff with a disputed check and further that the defendant. Ali had actually withdrawn money from the bank. The plaintiff failed to exclude the burden; his claim in connection with these checks was properly dismissed by the appellate court below.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firms from Hattian lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.