Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER

Applicant's Luxury Standing for the Displacement of Landless People (Land Settlement) Act, 1958, Section 21 and 21 Allotment of land was not available to show that land was ever declared a building site in dispute. But on the other hand, in the question of the Chief Settlement Commissioner in the transfer case, the land clearly observes that on the basis of the certified claim, the land was allotted and confirmed in favor of the transfer. And was not available as a building site because there was nothing complimentary on the part of the applicant. Deviation is possible. Correcting these observations: The applicant challenged such allotment, otherwise the respondent had no place to challenge the allotment, claiming that the land in dispute was declared a building site. And thus defendant cannot be transferred against his or her rural claim. It is also entitled to transfer, there was no substance and no s Pakistan, top advocate family court from Rahimyar Khan lawyer