Find a Lawyer

MUHAMAMD ASLAM versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

Punjab Local Councils (vote of no-confidence against chairman or vice-chairman) Rules 1980 R3 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The motion against the chairman was sought by the authority, notices requested The Thi Member Council waited for the appointed officer for the appointed day to preside over the meeting, but he did not appear by the appointed time. After the meeting, stating that his jeep was broken when the designated officer called the meeting and asked the present members to consider the motion of no-confidence in which the members voted in favor of the movement. Challenged the action to the ground. That he was not given proper notice of the meeting and that the proceedings after the stipulated time was an illegal application, when the appeal of the leave of the High Court was approved, it would be examined whether the applicant and When the other members left after waiting for the officer for half an hour, it was illegal to hold the meeting and he expressed serious prejudice to him. jobs for fresh advocates from Kalaswala lawyer