Find a Lawyer

AKHTAR AND HAFMANN LTD versus ULBRICHTS WWE

Civil Procedure Code Order XI, Article 185 (3) of CPC Discovery and Inspection O, XI, R13, filed a petition against the defendants in the knowledge of such order under the plaintiff's case for account approval. Was. Appealing to the order of the former parliament, the trial court dismissed the defendants' plea not served in the ordinary course. Applicants claimed that the respondents had appeared before a local commissioner who had passed a former party decree. Was appointed and the respondents knew of the record of the proceedings, however, it did not show that the lawyer was also empowered. Respondents' decision to revise the first Appellate Court and High Court in the court was the realistic aspect of the case, in which the notice was issued to the respondents in order to circulate it abroad. Cannot be made where the respondents who were permanently discovered are listed by the courts below and there is no question of law. Involved in the petition, leave denied best law firms from Malakwal lawyer