Find a Lawyer

SHAMIM AKHTAR versus ADDITIONAL DIGRICT JUDGE, SIALKOT

Article 5 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 and Schedule Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The decree of the wife in accordance with the conditions in the court is the right to care because the wife was refused to be cared for "Refund" was not replaced. The performance of the maintenance permit / entrapment was not dependent on the entitlement to care, the husband did not, in his written statement in the rehabilitation case by the wife, state that his demands Despite the fact that the wife refused to fulfill her marital obligations or to stay with her, the court was at fault for canceling the manifesto decree that kh was not rescinded, after which the wife had no right to recover. advocate from Kech lawyer