KHAN ZAMAN versus THE STATE
The Prosecutor's appreciation of the Evidence for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 (3) and 7 provided a clear statement to the court that the affidavit was trustworthy and the more it was examined, the clearer it became clear that That alone was the prosecutor's statement. It is sufficient to prove allegations about the possibility of sealing cotton cotton from a source other than the accused, however, they could not be completely ruled out. In this season and in the absence of ejaculation tests, the defendant's case went to the standard of 18 years and he was entitled to benefit from Section 7 of the Ordinance in the case of punishment as he was admitted to his age 13/14. As a result, the accused was retained, but accordingly his sentence was reduced
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Hujra Shah Muqeem lawyer
