Find a Lawyer

MUBEENA BEGUM versus DEPUTY LAND COMMISSIONER, KHAIRPUR

Failure to cite the owner of the Land Reforms Act 1977 Section 27 Declaration of excessive area of land sold by the owner of the effect, could not complain to the Land Reform Authorities, as it filed a Land Reform Act To determine its entitlement. As of 1977, neither in the Declaration Form nor in the public records was there any reference or reference to such a transaction, Land Commission officials have determined that the owner is entitled to it. More or less territory is obtained, however, the same Wendy of the area was ordered to be restored. , Joined the owner as the appellant against the restoration of the additional land, while in the appeal such vendors were allowed a full hearing and allowed to present all the documents on which they depended. Was placed by the company so no complaint can be made by these vendors. They were not given what they were entitled to, even if the announcer did not disclose such innocence in his declaration. immigration advocate from Gujar Khan lawyer