Article 25 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 and 38 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Complaint application worker who was removed from the job due to absenteeism. Almost two months later, the department filed an appeal, which was finally dismissed from the employee's dismissal of the job without a notice of complaint to the employer 5 years after his dismissal, and the department's appeal was finalized. Two years after being rejected, the Labor Court accepted and the employee was ordered to appeal to the Appeal Tribune The reinstatement of the trial, therefore, put aside the Labor Court's decision that the appellate court was able to pass all appellate court orders after the continuation of the original proceedings, leading to the trial of the original court, It should be approved. The Labor Appellate Tribunal had jurisdiction to allow the appellant to raise the question of limitation, though it was not specifically requested in the memorandum of appeal that the appeal was specifically placed before the appellate tribunal, on record. In view of the available evidence, the Tribunal rightly concluded that the complaint petition was barred by which the appellate tribunal's order was improper.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
