Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HAKEEM versus ABDUL WAHID

Law Evidence Order 1984 Article 16363 OO Law Act (X of 1873), Section 8 Parties agree on the administration of special oath and the effect of such restraint had the defendant already scrutinizing the evidence to prove his claim but Defendant could not present evidence to the defendant. Although the plaintiff reached an independent settlement to resolve the dispute through the plaintiff's special request, Article 163, the law was under the provisions of that testimony, his agreement on the compliance of his special oath and his determination to resolve the dispute with the offer The special affirmation of the plaintiff's signature on the defendant's conduct was specifically endorsed by the signing of the plaintiff's signature, there is ample evidence that the plaintiff and the plaintiff took an oath on that basis. Was legal, the defendant could not be allowed to take any kind of case or resign from the oath which was actually executed Oops best advocate from Nowshera Cantt lawyer