Find a Lawyer

ARIF HAYAT versus PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES

Reglns 35 01, 3L5 02 & 35 04 Appellant Services, who was the Captain in the PIA, was terminated as a matter of retirement with the idea of smoothing the financial status of the PIA while terminating the job. Was ordered to look for jobs during. Elsewhere and employees were assured of all possible help in their resettlement. Appellant found a job for himself at a foreign airline and applied for approval for a leave without pay. And I was not discharged because the appellant had already made it. After affiliating with a foreign airline, he applied for his retirement benefits. Appellant's request was considered as a request for resignation and he was released from PIA service without retirement benefits; Appellant was asked to withdraw and he was allowed to resign, but He was resigned to his position. Captain DC 10 on some of the terms and conditions which the Appellant accepted property advocate from Chohar Jamali lawyer