The value of the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302, 307 and 452 evidence was not previously known as being in serious shock and the possibility of tension and error in such a situation could not be ruled out. Why was the test delayed and kept 50 days after the arrest of the accused eye witness? He did not believe in the identity of the perpetrator and his evidence cannot be relied upon. Evidence of recovery was unnatural and not only was the value sufficient to bring a domestic charge in the murder case, the accused was acquitted, giving the benefit of the doubt in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
