SIKANDAR A. KARIM versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE
The applicant of the Sections 32 and 215 Notice of Service, who transferred the importer, claimed that the person responsible for the short payment of customs duty did not have proper service of notice provided that he was the importer of the car in dispute law. Notes can be worked on. The notice of confession to the agent for whom it was intended or the service of his agent was confessed to the agent, on which the applicant became aware of such notice, of the applicant. The dispute was overturned.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Gharo lawyer
