Find a Lawyer

NOOR MUHAMMAD versus MULAZIM HUSSAIN

Code of Civil Procedure 1908 Sections 2 (12) and 115 Profit as Mason's Profit Owner As for the property of the plaintiff in the immunity case, the trial court and the first appeals court dismissed the second appeal, the plaintiff The status quo is subject to the provision of security, which was later confirmed on the same plaintiff's appeal The second appeal was dismissed after the defendant claimed a claim for "mason profit" for the period during which the status quo. The order was stayed in the field. EL Court's satisfaction was implemented as per the High Court's order that the High Court had approved the order, which is subject to the presentation of security under trial court's satisfaction and nothing more. Fewer trial cases. The court directed the defendants to submit the specific amount of security that was offered by them according to the High Court order. To be presented to the satisfaction of the trial court, when such an order was passed, the defendants did not object to the execution of the bond of bail nor during the second appeal hearing. The trial court's order to pay Mason's profit did not face any unlawful interference or material misconduct to the extent of the specified amount, although a very high profile has been claimed in the circumstances of the case. The security offered by was limited to the amount received by the bond. advocate from Akhora Khattak lawyer