Find a Lawyer

MST. SHAGUFTA NASIR versus ABID HUSSAIN

Sections 16 (1) and (2) Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court scope for eviction of tenants, failure to comply with rent control order, temporary rents to tenant / applicant Directed for submission to Jat. Court Petitioner / Tenant failed to submit rent and did not comply with rent controller's order, consequently discrimination dismissal order was granted Appeal filed by tenant was dismissed by Appellate Court Validity Petitioner / Rental The tenant was unable to comply with the rent controller's order. There was every justification to prevent the tenant's defense and no exception could be taken on the order under which the impugned orders passed by the two courts did not guarantee any interference by the High Court in its constitutional jurisdiction. Constitutional application dismissed

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2014

• GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary 2014 PLC(CS) 797
• DADAI alias ASHRAF v. State 2014 MLD 802
• Rao MUHAMMAD ARASTU v. State 2014 PCrLJ 802
• A & A SERVICES through Proprietor v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Finance 2014 CLD 809
• KHUDA BUKHSH v. State 2014 YLR 814
• Syed AZEEM SHAH v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Local Government Sindh 2014 CLC 816
• HAJAN v. IST ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, DADU 2014 PCrLJ 824
• WEAVE AND KNIT (PVT.) LTD. v. FREIGHT SYSTEMS CO. LTD., L.L.C. 2014 PTD 824

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2014 →

top advocates from Bhara Kahu lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes