ABDUR REHMAN versus ASLAM AHMED
Sindh Rented Premise Ordinance 1979 Section 15 (2) (iii) (a) (iv) Evidence of tenant and allegedly all tenant regarding making free tenancy between the landlord and the alleged sub-tenant remains inconsistent and established. The landlord did not provide any evidence. As far as the terms of the house being abandoned in the dispute, they were alleged to have alleged that the tenants had defrauded prices or that the utility of the place was not supported to some extent. But the fact was not confirmed by any evidence that the tenants had made any additions or alterations, they would not give the landlord the right to evict because it was the landlord's charge that the alleged addition and alteration As a result, the value or utility of the premises has deteriorated.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Fateh Pur lawyer