NEELAM NAWAZ versus THE STATE
Section 11 && and 36 36 Activities under the Terrorist Activities Pressure (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Section 7 led to the recovery of a vehicle that was ransomed by her husband while in custody. The money recovered was purchased by a person who kidnapped a person and the money was recovered from the fact that such recovery falls within the purview of Section 411, PPC and not under section 365A, The PPC accused was prosecuted by a special court for suppressing terrorist activities for a crime that was not a scheduled offense, under which he would be sentenced. This will be gross injustice and the restriction of section 7 (1) of the Suppression of Terrorism Activities (Special Courts) Act 1975 will not apply.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Balakot lawyer