RAEES KHAN versus THE STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 367 West Pakistan Weapons Ordinance (XX of 1965), charged with the recovery of a licensed revolver from the accused for commitment before a Section 13 trial, whether the licensed arm of the father of the said pistol accused As it was stated by the (accused) and whether the pistol was recovered from the accused person or from the house as the accused trial court neither made any point or point for the determination, nor did he Explain the reasons for your decision to plead guilty. After the prosecution court re-examined the evidence of the prosecution witnesses, summarized the defense witnesses, and briefly discussed the provisions of section 103, the CRPC once concluded that the defense version was baseless. ? The defendant's offense proved to be 'unlimited' and did not make a concerted effort to review the litigation and the evidence contained in it, and the ad offered a reason to accept the prosecutor's story as a defense story. Did not, the trial court, in the trial, ignored the requirements of Section 367, CR PC in the circumstances, [decision]
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Bewal lawyer