Find a Lawyer

NASEER AHMAD versus THE STATE

The crime of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (2) Review of Evidence Prosecutors testified that Ocular's account was concurrent and clear and was disputed by medical evidence when it was alleged that If it was examined under section 342, it could not provide any reprehensible explanation. The CRPC further refused to make an affidavit statement and to defend the defense evidence, thus prosecuting the accused had thus proved his conviction and consequently the conviction was upheld. inheritance advocates near Dandot lawyer