MUKHTAR AHMAD ALIAS BHOLI versus STATE
Under section 2, under CRCPC, section idence40 ((?) and 2 342 of the Code of Criminal Procedure) were read, CCPC was administered oath by the court under section 340 (2). Read as evidence of, CRPC: It was inspected after the prosecution came closer to the evidence in which he was examined by the accused, alleging that he violated section 340 (2), CRPC. Agreed to the inquiry, but under the section 12, CRPC, the statement of the oath without the accused was read under section 340 (2), the CCP rejected the trial, and the trial court dismissed it. Which was not possible under the law Had the trial court conducted the recording of the accused's statements himself, it could not have been approved and the trial court had recorded the record under section 34040 (?), Cr., The PC facing it was illegal. And could not read it as proof of the oath
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Tando Adam lawyer
