HINDU PANCHAYAT OF SUKKUR versus MATLOOB AHMED
Sindh Rented Premise Ordinance 1979 Sections 21 (1) and 22 Implementation of the Withdrawal Order The evidence on the appellant / defendants' record claim was illegal on the premises in the dispute and it was defeated by the order of the courts. Was an attempt to give. Despite the knowledge of the eviction proceedings between the landlord and the original tenant under which the Supreme Court was retained as the appellant / objector, he made no attempt to join the proceedings, but rather Instead, it gave religious color to a property dispute, which admittedly was never part of the Hindu temple, as claimed by the appellant, but was dismissed by all relevant forums.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Rajana lawyer
