MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ versus BASHIR AHMAD CHAUDHRY
Section 54 of the Law Concerning Evidence (of 10 of 1984), documents related to property submitted by applicants and respondents in the application, through the sales 75 and 76 rival sales actions, namely the seller and the claimant. The entrant's sale and sale agreement was proved. The documentation prepared by the respondent / vendor was executed ie receipt, sale and sale contract was not executed by any vendor / respondent and it was not proved that the respondent / vendor Such documents produced were not genuine copies of copies of the original production of the documents, in violation of the provisions of Article 75, Law Evidence 1984, under which the documents must be proved by substantive evidence, except in those cases. Evidence that I can provide evidence of the existence, condition or contents of a document in the cases mentioned S (a) to (i) Article 76, the law and the evidence case, therefore, Article 76 Resp responder * views copies did not come from (i) to develop (i) clauses. Nail, object
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Nowshero Feroz lawyer