S. MUHAMMAD HASSAN versus S. JAVEDI FATIMA
Para 2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The petitioner against the cancellation of his PTO was dismissed by the High Court for illegal proceedings, the petition for restitution of the constitutional petition was also dismissed. It was also his leave of intra-court appeal that allowed him to examine whether despite the federal government's declaration of a public holiday that day as a public holiday, the High Court hearing about the notification suffered a legal impediment. And if not, the applicant or his lawyer was negligent of negligence which led to the demand for a fine. Their dismissed applicants were allowed on a verbal request to cure the current plea against a single judge's decision; if it was ultimately decided that the intra-court appeal was not authorized, the applicants were allowed They delayed the petition for condolences.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Kamalia Musa lawyer