HIGHNOON LABORATORIES LIMITED versus FARIDA JAWAID MALIK
Section 17 of the Cantonment Rent Restriction Act, application for eviction, jurisdiction which was not included in the petition, had the effect that the petitioner was the tenant of the property and the property was within the limits of the cantonment. In the absence of a clause in this case, no specific form of the tenant eviction request was made under the Act XI of 1963, especially when the solicitation requests were made by the lawyer, they should ensure that That proceedings included parcels, jurisdiction and court fees. The default duty was on the controller to enforce the rent, subject to heavy costs.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Kotla Pathan lawyer
