Find a Lawyer

WALAYAT SHAH versus THE STATE

Section 156 (1) (8) of the evidence was examined by the complainant in full support of the contents of the FIR: after the conscience supported the rehabilitation of the examiner in the examination, to support the defendant's inspector. Attempts were made, however, to admit that the goods of the accused were opened in his presence where gold and wrist watches were recovered, the adviser also admitted that the said goods belonged to the accused in the court and that The counselor was read to him and the other adviser and he signed the same, the accused prosecution did not challenge him, thus; Will doubtless proved his case against the accused and the charges and imprisonment of the accused were retained with the benefit of Section 382B, however, the PC was punished, in view of the small amount of smuggled goods. decrease solicitors from Hasilpur lawyer