Find a Lawyer

MUSHTAQ AHMAD versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT

R 6 Extra negligence and negligence Prevention Appellant was found guilty of negligence and negligence in his public duties when he was found to be driving a public vehicle in violation of traffic rules on a public highway, further alleging that Supplied second-hand tires for the vehicle. The inquiry officer who received the price of the new tires but did not complete the charge before the second charge was completely dismissed by the Prime Minister Secretariat, the inquiry officer stated that the appellant was either unaware of the actual facts of the tire change. Or he was too careless to investigate. Two additions to the old tire appellant were withheld with no collective effect. Appellant was already warned twice to stay on top of his duty. The order to stop the increment was maintained top civil advocates from Fateh Jang lawyer