Find a Lawyer

SANAULLAH versus THE STATE

Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance 1979 Sections 9, 7 and 5 of the Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), section 380 charged with theft and liability for theft. Stole two sets of jewelry and left the store, escaped on a motorcycle and waited for him, and there was no other witness except the son and the complainant, the theft case was not on the case. Was established but was responsible for theft against trespassing because the requirements under section 7 of this ordinance were not fulfilled but the amount of evidence required to prove the lineage (lineage evidence) was not fulfilled but the other The purification requirement was related to sesame honey. Due to lack of a Federal Shariat Court, the sentence of the accused from section 9 of the ordinance was changed to section 380, the PPC read with section 14 of the ordinance and sentenced to five years imprisonment. Section 382B, CR PC Envelope famous supreme court advocate from Tando Allahyar lawyer