Find a Lawyer

ZAHOOR HUSSAIN versus ABDUL HAMID

Article 114 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Punjab Tenancy Act 1887, occupying tenants was paying 2/5 per cent share of the produce to the owners of the enclave while they had the occupied tenants with 3/5 of the production. The soil is intact, which includes earth. During the stabilization process, the dispute was divided proportionately, the land in the withdrawal shares was diverted to the central government and later allotted to a refugee who transferred it to the applicant's occupying tenants. After the acquisition of the proprietary rights was sold to the applicants, the constitutional petition was filed by the Revenue Officers following the orders of the Khat Distribution Authorities. All orders, including allotment in favor of the foregoing, were illegal and the applicants purchased the land. The constitutional request was dismissed to appeal to the proprietors in the interests of the proponents who are neither CH before any appropriate forum, the controversial division of proportional shares by the consolidation authorities nor the allotment of the land to the evacuation section And after this, the applicants can not claim more than that in advance allotment of the defendants' interests or the ownership of the land in dispute in the dispute. They purchased from their shopkeepers, which neither sought nor engaged in any of them. best law firm from Mangowal lawyer