QADIR BAKHSH versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, TOBA TEK SINGH
The Punjab Local Government Ordinance 1979, sections 31 and 38 of the Punjab Local Council (vote of no confidence against the chairman or vice chairman), 1980, 3, 4 and 5 are a complete violation of the principles of natural justice, the principle of natural justice. An opportunity to defend the show cause notice or the existence of a good and reasonable basis or to conduct an inquiry or to serve any proceedings against which the motion for no-confidence was sought, to ascertain the allegations against the Chairman. Cannot be extended even after rendering. The act of no-confidence shall not be construed to impede or restrict the right to remove a person from the position of chairman or vice-chairman of the election workers / members, neither in the ordinance nor in the rules, of the showcase notice. There were no provisions for the service or no charge sheet nor any allegations or allegations for the meeting of the trustee or the chairman was required to be informed in any way. The allegations, allegations or allegations, however, were extended to the extent that the chairman or vice-chairman The tail is facing a confidence motion, he would have the right to present oral or written personal description as the description was written. Has been offered, it should be distributed to members and should be part of a record of no-confidence proceedings, such a request was complied with not to give the chairman an opportunity to verbally address the members. , Especially when the majority of council members do not matter. He was not even willing to listen
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
pakistani advocates Kamokey lawyer