Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

THE STATE versus IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN GILANI


Arts 3 and 7 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 403 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 340 (2) were accused of fraudulently and forfeiture of public funds by a federal minister, the law accused the Provided the opportunity. 3 340 (2), to appear as his own witness under CR PC and Article 7, to state on the statement that he has allocated public funds under the Representative Office (Corruption Punishment) Order, 1977. That the receipts in his possession were genuine, and that the keeping of his personal custody was for certain reasons and that there was no negative indication of criminal intent, even though the defendant did not appear as his own witness on the oath. But if he had appeared on the oath as his own witness and had come out victorious from cross examination, he would have shifted his burden of prosecution to satisfy the court. Given that his statement about the oath was false.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
ask a advocate free from Kunri lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.