Find a Lawyer

DARAZ KHAN versus THE STATE

They had no enmity for making false allegations against the police officers who were witnesses to the prosecution of the testimony of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965, Sections 307/34 and 353 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965). Was arrested at the crime scene. A report by the forensic science laboratory containing the weapons and ammunition also supported the litigation that the accused had resorted to indiscriminate firing on the police party, which fortunately proved ineffective. Duties and the use of criminal power with the intention of stopping or stopping them from performing their duties, such as the recovery of illegal weapons and ammunition from public servants, the accused have been proved by prosecution witnesses and the culprits have been convicted. Was also maintained under conditions lawer from fb area from Kashmore lawyer