Find a Lawyer

NAJMUDDIN versus ANIS FATIMA

According to the record by the High Court in the legal status of the appeal, the tenant of the Sindh Ordinance 1979 section 16 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 of the tenant for not submitting the rent amount according to the temporary rent order of the rent control order. Defense was abolished. Prior to the rental submission order, the tenant was, in fact, in the case of miscellaneous rent depositing a certain amount of rent as rent, the amount deposited by the tenant who ordered the deposit by the rent controller, The tenant was repeatedly paying rent, including electricity charges. Prior to the target date, the controller must either demand the same withdrawal from the landlord in case of miscellaneous rent or withdraw the money deposited in the alternative and allow it to be deposited as per the rent controller's order but they The request was not processed and their defense strike order on the defense approved against the tenant was terminated, thus the tenant could not be considered in this case if the rent controller failed to enforce an unfair order. Has failed to comply with an order passed by the rental controller regarding the rent submission, the rent It was wrong to keep control of the money collected in the name of another person Miscellaneous rented. So much money from the defendant was deposited in the name of the defendant's husband, in whose name the premises electricity bill was issued, in the absence of any positive evidence, it is likely that the respondent's husband was all practical. For the purpose the landlord could not. Rejecting the tenant controller's order to withhold the tenant's defense and doing so attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Minchanabad lawyer