Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHAN versus MUHAMMAD FAROOQ KHAN

The Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 1212 (3) allowed the appellate court to consider whether the defendant's appeal on the merit without recording any reason for the delay in the service tribunal and his Whether or not it was legally allowed to give permission. The defendants in particular were taken by the government. If the plaintiff in the election date, as the plaintiff, in whose cadre he was promoted, may apply, under the law, from a previous date, as the service tribunal had allowed on the heads of other persons, Prior development was given and they were suspended. ; If the decision of the Service Tribunal does not conform to the fitness of the participating respondents to qualify for a particular position or to be promoted to a higher position or grade in which there is no appeal to the Service Tribunal. Even if the defendant waives the penalty for preventing the development imposed on the competing defendant, he deserves to be considered for publicity for disappointment. Whether the countersigning authority was able to, under the law, disagree with the reporting officer in the case of AC Rupees and whether the reporting officer or the countersigning authority has the duty to justify the negative comments by presenting evidence before the service tribunal. And whether the Service Tribunal did not falsely confirm the facts and did not err in the law, in granting prior honorarium to respondents and making negative comments in specific years in its AC. patent advocate from Rabwah lawyer