Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD USMAN versus STATE


Section 404040 Conventional Code ~ XLV 18 186060), Section 2302 / ?77 / ? 148 / ? 149 / who2 witnesses who were summoned as court witnesses under Section 404040, CRPC. So he was not named in the FIR, neither was examined by the police, nor were his names listed. None of the prosecution's witnesses in the challan, nor any of the witnesses examined in the case, mentioned the incident, so it cannot be said that they sought from the record of the case. Be deemed necessary It can be always alleged that the trial court in the course of the trial had passed orders to assist the investigating authority and the prosecutor to meet the material deficiency caused by his own mistakes, and thus a neutral order. Had not cast a shadow over it. The trial court summoned the men to appear as court witnesses

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firm from Mehmood Kot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.